III. EFFECT OF PLANTING DATES ON POLLINATION INCIDENCE IN MAIZE

Authors

Keywords:

Poor pollination, VPD, Diente de Perro, water stress.

Abstract

The study was conducted at the IDIAP Experimental Station in El Ejido-Los Santos, located at 7°54’ N latitude and 80°22’ W longitude, at approximately 25 m above sea level. The experimental unit consisted of six rows, each 5.2 m long, arranged at 0.75 m between rows and 0.20 m between plants. The effective plot comprised the two central rows of each experimental unit. Two maize hybrids and two production systems-rainfed and supplemental drip irrigation dependent on seasonal rainfall-were evaluated. Sowing was carried out on three different dates (August, September, and October), spaced 20 days apart, so that plant development occurred under contrasting environmental and rainfall conditions. The objective of the study was to identify the climatic variable that most strongly influences grain yield. The symptom with the most significant impact on yield reduction was the incidence of “Diente de Perro” (DPE), or poorly pollinated ears. In plots with supplemental irrigation, DPE incidence increased from 3.0% and 5.3% in August and September to 51.5% in the October sowing, corresponding to a 54.5% yield reduction in October. This effect was even more pronounced under rainfed conditions: DPE incidence rose from 2.6% and 8.8% in August and September to 61.0% in the October sowing, resulting in a 69.2% yield reduction. In both systems, the same environmental factors affected male and female flowering during the 15-day post-silking period. Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was the climatic variable that most strongly influenced the increase in DPE incidence, showing high correlations with both tassel flowering (r > 0.70) and silk flowering (r > 0.80).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (2006). Evapotranspiración del cultivo- Guías para la determinación de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos. FAO Riego y Drenaje 56. FAO. Roma. ISBN 92-5-304219-2.

Aylor, D. E. (2004). Survival of maize (Zea mays) pollen exposed in the atmosphere. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123,125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.12.007

Aylor, D. E. (2003). Rate of dehydration of corn (Zea mays) pollen in the air. Journal of experimental Botany, 54(391), 2307-2312. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg242

Begcy, K., & Dresselhaus, T. (2018). Epigenetic responses to abiotic stresses during reproductive development in cereals. Plant Reprod. 31, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-018-0343-4

Bheemanahalli, R., Ramamoorthy, P., Poudel, S., Samiappan, S., Wijewardane, N., & Reddy, K. R. (2022). Effect of drought and heat stresses during reproductive stage on pollen germination, yield and leaf reflectance properties in maize (Zea mays). Plant Direct 6(8), e434. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.434

Dong, X., Li, B., Yan, Z., Guan, L., Huang, S., Li, S., Qi, Z., Tang, L., Tian, H., Fu, Z., & Yang, H. (2024). Impacts of high temperature, relative air humidity, and vapor pressure deficit on the seed set of contrasting maize genotypes during flowering. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(9), 2955-2969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.007

Fonseca, A. E., & Westgate, M. E. (2005). Relationship between desiccation and viability of maize pollen. Field Crops Research, 94(2-3), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.12.001

Garay, J. A., & Cruz-Colazo, J. (2015). El cultivo de maíz en San Luis. Información Técnica 188.

Gordón-Mendoza, R. (2021) El maíz en Panamá: Características, requerimientos y recomendaciones para su producción en ambientes con alta variabilidad climática. Instituto de Innovación Agropecuaria de Panamá. 110p. https://proyectos.idiap.gob.pa/uploads/adjuntos/manual_tecnico_el_maiz_en_panama.pdf

Gupta, S. K., Rai, K. N., Singh, P., Ameta, V. L., Gupta, S., Jayalekha, K., Mahala, R. S., Pareek, S., Swami, M. L., & Verma, Y. S. (2015), Seed set variability under high temperatures during flowering period in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. (R.) Br.). Field Crops Research, 171, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.005

Hatfield, J. L., & Dold, C. (2018). Climate change impacts on corn phenology and productivity. In: Amanullah, Fahad, S., editors. Corn Production and Human Health in Changing Climate. London, UK: IntechOpen. Chapter, 6, 95-114. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76933

Herrero, M. P., & Johnson, R. R. (1980). High Temperature Stress and Pollen Viability of Maize. Crop Science, 20(6), 796. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060030x

Lauer, J. G., Carter, P. R., Wood, T. M., Diezel, G., Wiersma, D. W., Rand, R. E., & Mlynarek, M. J. (1999). Corn Hybrid Response to Planting Date in the Northern Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal, 91, 834-839. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.915834x

Lauer, J. G. (2006). Concerns about drought as corn pollination begins. University of Winconsin Agronomy Department. Field Crops, 28, 493-42. https://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/AA/pdfs/A042.pdf

Lizaso, J. I., Ruiz Ramos, M., Rodríguez, L., Gabaldon Leal, C., Oliveira, J. A., Lorite, I. J., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Impact of high temperatures in maize: Phenology and yield components. Field Crops Research, 216, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.013

Ndlovu, E., van Staden, J., & Maphosa, M. (2021). Morpho-physiological effects of moisture, heat and combined stresses on Sorghum bicolor [Moench (L.)] and its acclimation mechanisms. Plant Stress, 2, 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2021.100018

Norwood, C. A. (2001). Planting Date, Hybrid Maturity, and Plant Population Effects on Soil Water Depletion, Water Use, and Yield of Dryland Corn. Agronomy Journal, 93(5), 1034-1042. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351034x

Oury, V., Caldeira, C. F., Prodhomme, D., Pichon, J. P., Gibon, Y., Tardieu, F., & Turc, O. (2016). Is change in ovary carbon status a cause or a consequence of maize ovary abortion in water deficit during flowering? Plant Physiology, 171(2), 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01130

Schoper, J. B., Lambert, R. J., & Vasilas, B.L. (1986). Maize Pollen Viability and Ear Receptivity under Water and High Temperature Stress1. Crop Science, 26(5), 1029. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050038x

Tebaldi, C., Hayhoe, K., Arblaster, J. M., & Meehl, G. A. (2006). Going to the extremes: An intercomparison of model simulated historical and future changes in extreme events. Climatic Change, 79(3-4), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9051-4

Turc, O., Bouteillé, M., Fuad-Hassan, A., Welcker, C., & Tardieu, F. (2016). The growth of vegetative and reproductive structures (leaves and skills) respond similarly to hydraulic cues in maize. New Phytologist, 212, 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14053

Traore, S. B., Carlson, R. E., Pilcher, C. D., & Rice, M. E. (2000). Bt and Non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. Agronomy Journal, 92, 1027-1035. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.9251027x

Wang, Y., Sheng, D., Zhang, P., Dong, X., Yan, Y., Hou, X., Wang, P., & Huang, S. (2021). High temperature sensitivity of kernel formation in different short periods around silking in maize. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 183, 104343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104343

Zhou, R., Yu, X., Ottosen, C.-O., Rosenqvist, E., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Yu, W., Zhao, T., & Wu, Z. (2017). Drought stress had a predominant effect overheat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biology, 17, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0974-x

Published

2026-01-08

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

III. EFFECT OF PLANTING DATES ON POLLINATION INCIDENCE IN MAIZE. (2026). Ciencia Agropecuaria, 42, 152-168. https://idiap.desarrollo-ojs1.metadatos.org/index.php/ciencia-agropecuaria/article/view/697

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>